• Oral semaglutide 25 mg demonstrated significantly greater mean weight loss than orforglipron 36 mg in a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) using data from the OASIS 4 and ATTAIN-1 clinical trials¹
  
  
  
  
• Treatment with orforglipron 36 mg was associated with ~14 times higher odds of stopping medication due to GI adverse events versus oral semaglutide 25 mg in the ITC¹
  
  
  
  
• In a separate patient preference study, 84% of survey respondents favored the treatment profile similar to oral semaglutide 25 mg compared to that similar to orforglipron²

PLAINSBORO, N.J. and BAGSVÆRD, Denmark, April 2, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Novo Nordisk will present the ORION study at the upcoming Obesity Medicine Association's annual conference in San Diego showing that Wegovy^® (semaglutide) tablets 25 mg was associated with significantly greater mean weight loss than orforglipron 36 mg in a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison¹. It is important to note that the FDA recently approved orforglipron under the brand name Foundayo™ at doses ranging up to 17.2 mg.³ The approved 17.2 mg tablet is the equivalent to the orforglipron 36 mg capsules used in phase 3 trials, and which served as the study comparator in ORION.^1,4 Additionally, in a separate patient preference study, adults with overweight or obesity showed greater preference for an oral semaglutide-like profile than an orforglipron-like profile.² These findings suggest potential differentiation and provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making.¹

"These studies add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical strength of semaglutide and highlight attributes that patients value when choosing an obesity medicine that fits their lifestyle," said Jamey Millar, executive vice president, US Operations of Novo Nordisk. "Since its approval, we've seen strong interest in Wegovy^® pill, from both healthcare professionals and people seeking obesity therapy, underscoring the importance of our continued focus on advancing obesity care through our relentless pursuit of innovation."

The ORION study was a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluating weight loss efficacy and tolerability between oral semaglutide 25 mg and orforglipron 36 mg using data from the OASIS 4 and ATTAIN-1 phase 3 clinical trials. A simulated treatment comparison was used to assess percentage change from baseline in body weight. A two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison was used for tolerability outcomes (treatment discontinuation due to any adverse event and due to gastrointestinal adverse events).¹ Analyses were adjusted for baseline body weight, glycemic status, and sex.¹

ORION results showed that oral semaglutide 25 mg demonstrated significantly greater weight loss compared with orforglipron 36 mg, with mean differences [95% CI] of -3.2 percentage points [-5.9, -0.4]^* regardless of whether patients stayed on treatment and -3.0 percentage points [-5.8, -0.3]^** if all patients stayed on treatment.¹ In addition, this analysis showed that when compared with oral semaglutide 25 mg, orforglipron 36 mg was associated with ~4 times higher odds of treatment discontinuation due to any adverse event (AEs) (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 4.1 [1.3, 13.0]) and ~14 times higher odds of treatment discontinuation due to AEs related to gastrointestinal (GI) issues (OR [95% CI]: 13.9 [2.0, 96.0]).¹

Although researchers adjusted for key baseline characteristics, other unaccounted factors may remain. Additionally, between-trial protocol differences may also influence comparability. While a significant difference was observed for tolerability, the magnitude of these differences should be interpreted with caution due to low adverse event counts.¹

"People often ask how one medication compares to another when making obesity treatment management decisions," said Robert F. Kushner, MD, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine. "Since there are no head-to-head trials comparing oral semaglutide for obesity to orforglipron, this indirect treatment comparison from the ORION study provides important information that can be used during the shared decision-making process."

Additionally, OPTIC was an online patient preference study assessing key factors driving obesity treatment decisions conducted from October to November 2025. The study was conducted among 800 adults with either obesity or overweight and at least one obesity-related complication, with or without prior experience using obesity medicine, and included a predicted choice comparison of hypothetical treatment profiles similar to oral semaglutide 25 mg and orforglipron.² Results of the predicted choice comparison based on clinical trial results showed that 84% of survey respondents favored the oral semaglutide-like profile option.² Additionally, a majority of all respondents (65%) agreed that taking a treatment on an empty stomach and waiting 30 minutes before eating (oral semaglutide-like dosing instructions) would not disrupt their daily lives.²

Key limitations include the study's observational nature, selection bias, and use of hypothetical profiles.² Because this survey was conducted prior to regulatory approval, treatment profiles may not exactly match the FDA-approved labeling for products.

It is important to note that semaglutide tablets 25 mg contains a Boxed Warning for possible thyroid tumors, including cancer and should not be used in those with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2). The most common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach (abdomen) pain, changes in skin sensations, headache, tiredness (fatigue), upset stomach, dizziness, feeling bloated, belching, low blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes, gas, stomach flu, heartburn, and hair loss.⁵

*Based on the treatment regimen estimand: treatment effect regardless of whether patients stayed on treatment or took other weight loss therapies. 

^**Based on the efficacy estimand: estimated efficacy in an idealized scenario in which all patients stayed on treatment and took no other weight loss therapies. 

About ORION 

The ORION study was a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) that evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral semaglutide 25 mg (OASIS 4 trial data) versus orforglipron 36 mg (ATTAIN-1 trial data) in adults with obesity (BMI>=30 kg/m²), or overweight (BMI >=27 kg/m²) and at least one weight-related comorbidity without diabetes. A simulated treatment comparison (STC) was used to compare percentage change from baseline in body weight, while a two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison (2SMAIC) was used to assess tolerability outcomes, including treatment discontinuations due to any adverse event (AEs) and gastrointestinal AEs. The analyses were adjusted for differences between trial populations, including sex, glycemic status (blood sugar levels), and baseline body weight however, residual differences may remain.¹

About OPTIC

OPTIC was a noninterventional, cross-sectional online survey study of 800 US adults with obesity or overweight and at least one obesity-related complication conducted between October-November 2025. Out of 800 survey respondents, half (n=400) had never used an obesity medicine and half (n=400) had used an obesity medicine. The survey included a discrete choice experiment which presented respondents with a series of questions to choose between two hypothetical oral obesity medicine profiles with 7 attributes such as efficacy, CV risk reduction, administration, and dosing instructions. Using a statistical model, researchers calculated preference weights, which were used to predict the probability an average respondent would choose a given treatment profile. Additionally, a predicted-choice comparison asked respondents to choose between an oral semaglutide-like and orforglipron-like treatment profile.²

About obesity 

Obesity is a serious, chronic, progressive, and complex disease that requires long-term management.^6-8 One key misunderstanding is that this is a disease of just lack of willpower, when in fact there is underlying biology that may impede people with obesity from losing weight and keeping it off.^6,8 Obesity is influenced by a variety of factors, including genetics, social determinants of health, and the environment.^9,10

About Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk is a leading global healthcare company with a heritage of more than 100 years in diabetes care. Building on this foundation, our purpose is to drive change to defeat serious chronic diseases — from diabetes and obesity to rare blood and endocrine disorders — by pioneering scientific breakthroughs, expanding access to medicines, and working to prevent and ultimately cure disease. We are committed to long-term, responsible business practices that deliver financial, social and environmental value. Headquartered in Denmark and operating in around 80 countries, Novo Nordisk employs approximately 68,800 people and markets products in roughly 170 countries. In the United States, Novo Nordisk has a 40-year presence, is headquartered in New Jersey and employs approximately 10,000 people across more than 10 manufacturing, R&D, and corporate locations in seven states plus Washington, D.C. For more information, visit novonordisk-us.com, Facebook, Instagram, and X.

References:

1. Michalak W, Laugesen C, Rathor N, et al. Oral Semaglutide vs Orforglipron in Obesity – An Indirect Comparison. Poster presentation presented at Obesity Medicine 2026. April 10, San Diego, California, US.
2. Tadesse Bell S, Traina A, Bhavsar J, et al.  Preferences for obesity medications among people with overweight or obesity. Poster presentation presented at Obesity Medicine 2026. April 10, San Diego, California, US.
3. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA Approves First New Molecular Entity Under National Priority Voucher Program. Last accessed: April 2026. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-new-molecular-entity-under-national-priority-voucher-program.
4. Foundayo. Prescribing Information. Lilly USA, LLC.
5. Wegovy^® (semaglutide) Prescribing Information. Plainsboro, NJ: Novo Nordisk Inc.
6. Kaplan LM, Golden A, Jinnett K, et al. Perceptions of barriers to effective obesity care: results from the national action study. Obesity. 2018;26(1):61–69.
7. Bray GA, Kim KK, Wilding JPH; World Obesity Federation. Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation. Obes Rev. 2017;18(7):715–723.
8. Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. 2016;22 (Suppl 3):1–203.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult obesity facts. Last accessed: April 2026. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult-obesity-facts/index.html.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Risk Factors for Obesity. Last accessed: April 2026. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/risk-factors/risk-factors.html.

© 2026 Novo Nordisk All rights reserved. US26SEMO00591 April 2026

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/466582/5898297/Novo_Nordisk_Logo.jpg

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/wegovy-pill-demonstrated-greater-weight-loss-than-orforglipron-and-lower-odds-of-stopping-medication-due-to-side-effects-in-a-new-indirect-comparison-to-be-presented-at-obesity-medicine-association-2026-302732768.html

Die Grünen verschärfen ihre Kritik an den erhöhten Zulagen für freigestellte Personalvertreter im öffentlichen Dienst und stellen die Dreierkoalition aus ÖVP, SPÖ und NEOS zunehmend unter Rechtfertigungsdruck. Nach einer Serie parlamentarischer Anfragen wirft die Partei der Regierung mangelnde Transparenz vor und spricht von einer „Mauer“ bei der Beantwortung detaillierter Fragen. Besonders im Visier steht die Dienstrechtsnovelle, mit der die Zulagen Ende 2025 gesetzlich angehoben und rückwirkend bis 2023 wirksam wurden.

Der Kern des Konflikts reicht zurück in den vergangenen Dezember: Damals beschloss der Nationalrat die deutliche Anhebung der Zulagen für Personalvertreter, während gleichzeitig eine bereits im Jahr davor fixierte Lohnerhöhung für alle öffentlich Bediensteten verschoben wurde. Den Vorwurf der Grünen, es habe einen politischen „Abtausch“ mit der Gewerkschaft Öffentlicher Dienst (GÖD) gegeben – höhere Zulagen für Personalvertreter gegen das Aufschieben der Gehaltserhöhung –, weisen sowohl das Büro des zuständigen Staatssekretärs Alexander Pröll (ÖVP) als auch die GÖD energisch zurück. Brisant ist dabei, dass auch die Grünen der Novelle ursprünglich zugestimmt hatten und dies später mit kurzfristigen Änderungen im Gesetzesentwurf begründeten.

Neue Brisanz erhält die Debatte durch Details, die aus den Regierungsantworten auf die Grünen-Anfragen hervorgegangen sind. Laut der stellvertretenden Klubobfrau Sigrid Maurer bestätigte Bildungsminister Christoph Wiederkehr (NEOS), dass die Zulagen für Personalvertreter in seinem Ressort künftig bis zu 3.580 Euro im Monat erreichen können. Weil die Regelung rückwirkend gilt, ergeben sich teils hohe Nachzahlungen. So habe das Justizministerium nach Angaben der Grünen in einem Einzelfall eine Nachzahlung von fast 109.000 Euro bestätigt. Im Justizbereich insgesamt sollen Nachzahlungen in der Größenordnung von über einer Million Euro anfallen, wobei diese Gesamtsumme laut einer APA-Sichtung der Anfragebeantwortung nicht eindeutig verifiziert wurde.

Für die Grünen zeigt der Fall eine strukturelle Schieflage im Umgang mit Mitteln im öffentlichen Dienst. Sie sprechen von „hunderten Personen“, die von den neuen Bestimmungen profitieren und „Millionen an Zulagen“ erhalten – eine Einschätzung, die sich auf die Summe aller Ressorts bezieht, aber auf Basis der vorliegenden Antworten nicht im Detail beziffert ist. Während Regierung und Gewerkschaft den Verdacht eines Deals zurückweisen, drängen die Grünen auf weitere Offenlegung und stellen die Frage nach der politischen Prioritätensetzung: Sonderzulagen für Personalvertreter auf der einen Seite, verschobene Lohnerhöhung für das gesamte öffentlich Bediensteten-Kollektiv auf der anderen. Wie die Koalition auf den wachsenden Druck reagiert, bleibt vorerst offen.